For Multi-Academy Trusts
Across your trust, inclusion decisions are being made school by school, often without a shared picture of learner needs, what support is already in place, what is working, or where the gaps are.
Relevant support may exist inside or outside the trust, but understanding what is available, whether it fits a learner’s requirements and how it connects to support already in place is harder than it should be at any scale, let alone across multiple schools.
Waypaths gives MATs shared infrastructure for understanding learner needs, mapping internal and external services, comparing support options and coordinating decisions across schools. The same structure can make gaps, evidence and review activity easier to see across the trust.

One picture across every school
Bring available information about learner needs, current support, agreed services and review activity into a shared structure across the trust. Teams can see what is known, what is still being considered and where information needs updating.
A clearer view of support across the trust
See what support is already in place, which needs it is intended to address, what has been agreed, what is still being considered and where information or provision gaps remain across your trust.
Compare services on the things that matter
Service-level comparison keeps eligibility, essential requirements, suitability and practical feasibility visible. Internal and external services can be considered through the same structure without paid ranking or an automatic placement decision.


What else changes across your trust

Consistent process across every school
Use a consistent structure for learner information, service comparison and recorded decisions across participating schools. Relevant service evidence can sit alongside the workflow, supporting trust-level oversight without replacing each organisation’s own assurance responsibilities.
Happier families
Where access and permissions allow, families can have a clearer view of what has been agreed for their child, who is responsible and what happens next. The aim is to reduce avoidable gaps and conflicting versions of the same information.
Keep provider evidence connected to services
Providers can supply relevant safeguarding, insurance and quality-assurance evidence alongside their service information. Authorised teams can review the evidence available to them while retaining responsibility for their own checks and approval decisions.
Pilot participation
Pilot timing and participation arrangements will be agreed with each participating trust before participation begins. Wider rollout arrangements will be confirmed separately.
Pilot access shaped around agreed testing
The pilot scope, participating schools and access arrangements will be agreed with each trust before participation begins.
A direct hand in shaping what’s built
Participating trusts may be invited to review workflows and provide feedback on the practical challenges the pilot is intended to test.
Ease Existing Pain Points
As an early adopter of Waypaths, we encourage trusts and their schools to share exactly what pain points are blocking them day-to-day to influence the future development of the platform.

Be part of building it
We’re preparing a pilot with participating organisations. Participating organisations will help test the workflows, information and safeguards needed in practice, with feedback informing further development. We’ve worked inside this sector. We know what’s not working. We want to build something better with the people who understand it best.
Pilot timing will be agreed with participating organisations.
